Companies that are winning over younger consumers are by and large those that have or that successfully adopt social causes and demonstrate a commitment to change. The fair and equal treatment of all professionals in the work force is top-of-mind for many consumers. But most companies, new research suggests, have not been making a priority of workplace equity.
A new study by IBM, “Women, Leadership, and the Priority Paradox,” polled 2,300 executives and professionals and revealed that the leadership gender gap in the global workplace continues to persist because organizations have yet to make advancing women a formal business priority. The study also provides guidance on how to drive change.
The study, conducted by the IBM Institute for Business Value (IBV) in cooperation with Oxford Economics, surveyed an equal number of women and men from organizations worldwide across multiple industries to better understand why a large gender disparity in the leadership ranks persists and what can be done to drive progress toward gender equality. In addition to the qualitative survey, IBV conducted a series of one-on-one interviews with executives and professionals across six global regions.
The study revealed that, within the organizations surveyed, only 18 percent of senior leadership positions are held by women. This is due to three key factors:
Organizations are not sold on the business value. 79 percent of respondents indicated that they have not formally prioritized fostering gender equality in leadership within their organizations, even though ample evidence correlates gender equity with improved financial success and competitive advantage.
Men underestimate the magnitude of gender bias in their workplaces. 65 percent of male executives reported it is just as likely they would have been promoted to a top leadership role even if they had been women, despite the low numbers of women that currently hold those roles.
Few organizations display a sense of urgency or ownership about this issue. Organizations are over-relying on “good intentions” and applying a laissez-faire approach to diversity, rather than applying the disciplined focus on operational execution they apply to other aspects of organizational performance.
“The past year has heightened the world’s focus on diversity, and the business benefits of inclusive teams are now well-documented,” says Michelle Peluso, Senior Vice President of Digital Sales and Chief Marketing Officer at IBM. “The opportunity now is to move from inclusion being interesting to being imperative—just like we treat other top business priorities.”
Despite these hurdles, there was a set of organizations, dubbed “First Movers,” that stood out as being dedicated to achieving gender equality within their leadership ranks. Comprising 12 percent of the total sample, these organizations share characteristics and values that foster a more inclusive environment and provide a roadmap of how to create progress for other organizations. These characteristics are as follows.
They are serious about gender inclusion. All of the First Movers (100 percent) have made advancing women into leadership roles a formal business priority. By comparison, only nine percent of other organizations have the same focus.
They are motivated by the promise of financial improvement. All (100 percent) are sold on the idea that gender-inclusive organizations are more successful financially, whereas only 38 percent of other organizations agree.
They acknowledge and embrace their responsibility to take action. All (100 percent) agree that businesses need to continue making changes to achieve gender equality in the workplace. While the majority of other organizations in our survey also agree, 29 percent more First Movers are passionate about taking action than other organizations.
“What we have learned from First Movers is the importance of setting measurable goals and defining a systematic approach to inclusion across the organization,” says Peluso. “This means everything from recruiting to rewarding, developing, retaining, and promoting women. And, then, we must ourselves be accountable to meet these goals.”

Recent Content