Please enter your username or the email address associated with the account so we can help you reset your password.
Better communication between retail bank officials and customers in Canada has led to a magnified customer experience and greater customer satisfaction levels.
Overall satisfaction with retail banks in Canada has improved significantly because customers are more receptive of increased fees incurred during the past two years, according to the J.D. Power 2016 Canadian Retail Banking Satisfaction Study.
Now in its 11th year, the study measures customer satisfaction with retail banks in two segments: Big 5 Banks and Midsize Banks. In both segments, customer satisfaction is measured by seven factors (listed in order of importance): Product; self-service; personal service; facilities; communication; financial advisor; and problem resolution. Satisfaction is calculated on a 1,000-point scale.
Overall satisfaction rose 23 points in 2016. Overall satisfaction in the Big 5 Banks segment averages 760, up from 737 in 2015; while satisfaction in the Midsize Banks segment increased to 783 from 759.
The study revealed that satisfaction has improved despite ongoing changes in fees. For example, 25% of Big 5 Banks customers in 2016 said they’ve experienced a change in their fee structures and 16% indicated that new fees were introduced, both about the same percentages as in 2015.
“The improvements indicate that customers are becoming less sensitive to new pricing structures, which caused satisfaction to tumble in 2015,” said Paul McAdam, senior director of banking services at J.D. Power. “The banks are doing a better job communicating with their customers, who now are seeing the value they are getting in return for higher fees.”
Mobile is fast becoming a major factor in the banking world.
According to the study, 34% of bank customers use mobile banking channels in 2016, up from 27% in 2015 and 20% in 2014. Overall satisfaction among customers who use and are satisfied with mobile banking is 836, compared with 760 among those who do not use the channel.
Among the banking channels in 2014, mobile banking generated the lowest satisfaction score (770). In 2016, satisfaction with mobile banking has improved by 34 points to 804, trailing only the in-person branch channel at 807.
“Mobile is changing customer interaction models and forcing banks to transform,” said McAdam. “Banking providers understand that customer expectations of interactivity with mobile devices are different than their expectations of other touch points. The effect of mobile is evident across many aspects of the banking customer experience.”
The impact of mobile goes beyond improving overall satisfaction with the bank. Highly satisfying mobile banking services can mitigate the negative impact of a problem or complaint; help maintain satisfaction with a smaller branch network; improve perceptions of available products and services; and reduce price sensitivity. For example, product satisfaction among customers who use and are satisfied with mobile is 795, compared with 710 among those who do not use mobile. Additionally, facility satisfaction among customers who have two or fewer branch offices nearby averages 788 among satisfied mobile users, compared with 739 among those who do not use mobile.
“Self-service makes banking more convenient for customers, with mobile technology being a key element of self-service,” said McAdam. “Despite the growing number of digital channel interactions, there is more that banks can do to drive customers to self-service channels for routine transactions, which make it easier for the customer and more cost-effective for the bank.”
Here are some other key findings in the study:
Customers Value Proactive Outreach: Proactively reaching out to customers regarding product and service benefits or to provide guidance on financial goals boosts overall satisfaction. Among customers who receive a proactive contact from their bank tailored specifically for their personal needs, overall satisfaction is 837, compared with 746 among customers who are not contacted.
Problem Prevention Is Critical to Satisfaction: Overall satisfaction averages 773 among the 86% of customers who have not experienced a problem with their bank in the past 12 months. When customers experience one or more problems, satisfaction plummets to 705. Problem incidence is higher among affluent customers3 and those who carry a balance of $10,000 or more, compared with other customers.
Problem Resolution Can Salvage Satisfaction: Even when customers experience a problem, banks can still keep them happy if they have processes in place to resolve issues quickly and efficiently. Simply resolving a problem increases satisfaction by 89 points, but resolving a problem on the first contact, on the same day and without transferring the customer improves satisfaction by 190 points.
RBC Royal Bank ranked highest in overall customer satisfaction among Big 5 Banks, achieving a score of 765. RBC Royal Bank performs particularly well in all seven factors, most notably in product. TD Canada Trust ranked second with a score of 761.
Among Midsize Banks, Tangerine ranked highest in overall customer satisfaction for a fifth consecutive year, with a score of 840. Tangerine performs particularly well in product, personal service, self-service and communication. President’s Choice Financial ranked second with a score of 789.
The 2016 Canadian Retail Banking Satisfaction Study is based on responses from more than 13,000 customers who use a primary financial institution for personal banking. The study includes the largest financial institutions in Canada and was fielded from April through May 2016.
Thank you for signing up, please check your email for more information.